Shostak talks extensively about the mysticism that surrounds
the Lisbon girls for the boys who watch them. She says that, to the boys, the
girls “remain impenetrable, but that is what fascinates the boys, making the
sisters a suitable subject for the mythic imagination" (9). She goes on to mention
that the reality of the girls and their situation comes into stark contrast
with the romanticized image the boys have of them—notably shown at Cecilia’s
party, when the boys’ expectations of the home do not match its reality.
These ruminations led me to find an interesting irony in the
life-long search of the boys to find an explanation for the Lisbon girls—their
lives and their suicides. It is as if the very inability of an answer to be
found makes the boys search all the harder. It is as if the Lisbon girls’
“impenetrability,” make the boys want to penetrate them all the more. It seems
that if the boys were able to come to some sort of conclusion regarding the
Lisbon girls, the mystery would be lost and the story would become altogether
irrelevant to them. Rather, the boys seem almost content teasing themselves
with bits of a puzzle they will never be able to put together.
Maybe, then, while the boys yearn to be near the Lisbon
girls—both when they were alive and after they die—they are also sure to keep a
safe distance that allows them to keep the Lisbon girls mythical and not real. This
is a distance they keep through reliance on second-hand accounts and
interpretations of “exhibits” and instances that suit a story they have created
in their minds.
--Francesca
--Francesca
No comments:
Post a Comment