This past week, I attended “My Own Worst Enemy” and “Reality
Bites.” I am going to blog about the second panel.
I found the papers on this panel extremely interesting. The
paper on In Cold Blood especially
caught my attention—the idea that nothing can ever be 100% representative of
reality is something that I have thought about before, and I was delighted to
hear about it in the context of the book. Another paper, on Into The Wild, also interested me. The
student who wrote it pointed out that to be able to survive in the wile, Chris
McCandles actually had to rely on things produced by society—he is always carrying
a backpack full of things and uses cars to get around.
What I found most interesting, though, came in the question
portion of the panel. The idea of an anti-social book came up. One student,
while talking about his paper—written on DeLillo’s Players—said that sometimes
a book—his in particular—is too busy reflecting on itself that it fails to reflect
anything about the outside world, and thus, fails to connect with the reader.
He says this makes it “anti-social.” The student concluded that there is little
value in this, and wondered why the author bothered to publish it if it was a
book written basically only for himself.
--Francesca
No comments:
Post a Comment