Is something people used to jokingly say in debate to make fun of high school teenagers who used Baudrillard to make their point and acted like they fully understood him.
I definitely still don't fully understand him and I'm not sure I ever will.
Nevertheless the two parts of Baudrillard that interested me the most
were first, his discussion of Disneyland as an artificial and infantile world
that is set up in such a way that makes us think the “adult” world is
non-infantile and non-simulated and second, his idea that media tries to make
itself seem real and creates a replication for which there is no original.
And I guess it interested me most because I feel at least
partially guilty of participating in that kind of simulation as someone who
works in a virtual reality lab on campus. At work, we’re always talking about
the difference between VR and the real world or how to make VR more like the
real world or how we purposefully want to leave some differences intact to
experiment with how some things can be left as noticeably unreal but still feel
immersive and real based on the immersive quality of other aspects of the VR
world.
And the other thing we do that Baudrillard would probably
hate is we have based our entire VR world on a young adult novel that imagines
an alternate WWI history that’s more biomech/steampunk, but that also has
totally different politics. Which, to some, would probably incidentally
reaffirm our current historical idea of WWI as real, rather than the projection
of historians working with limited information.
To be honest, though, while I feel guilty of doing what
Baudrillard talks about, I don’t feel guilty as if it is some horrible thing. I
don’t know. Maybe I’m crazy, but I think the existence of all of these modern
simulacra can actually force us to question the “realness” of reality, rather
than treat it as artificially realer than our imagined worlds. I mean, I think
the fact that their existence has given rise to a writer like Baudrillard is
interesting. We’re forced to question the realness of reality MORE in my
opinion simply because there are all these simulations swimming about. And it’s
not as if the nonreality of reality is the new part. It’s always been around
with misinformation, propaganda, artificial images of royalty/celebrity, etc. So,
I guess speaking personally, the only area where Baudrillard’s concerns really
concern me is war. But that’s a separate issue and wasn’t really addressed in
this excerpt. But yeah, drones and the virtualizing of war is really scary.
By Jack
No comments:
Post a Comment